{"id":5201,"date":"2024-12-16T21:16:48","date_gmt":"2024-12-17T02:16:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/?p=5201"},"modified":"2024-12-16T21:28:29","modified_gmt":"2024-12-17T02:28:29","slug":"farm-forward-and-us-senators-push-usda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/news\/farm-forward-and-us-senators-push-usda\/","title":{"rendered":"Farm Forward and U.S. Senators Push USDA for Stronger Food Label Regulations to Protect Consumers, Independent Farmers"},"content":{"rendered":"\t<section class=\"normal_content bg-white padding-top-small padding-bottom-large\" style=\"\">\n\t\t<div class=\"container\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"row center-md\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"col-md-7\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"content-styled\"><p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Three U.S. Senators, working closely with Farm Forward, have urged the USDA&#8217;s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) to strengthen its guidelines on animal welfare and environmental labeling claims, citing widespread deception in food marketing that harms both consumers and independent farmers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.blumenthal.senate.gov\/imo\/media\/doc\/2024-11-22_comment_letter_to_usda_re_animal_raising_claims.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">letter<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> addressed to USDA Deputy Under Secretary Sandra Eskin, Senators Richard Blumenthal, Cory A. Booker, and Sheldon Whitehouse outlined serious concerns about the current <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.fsis.usda.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/media_file\/documents\/FSIS-GD-2024-0006.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">guidelines<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. The letter notes that the guideline \u201cfalls short of what is needed to protect producers and consumers from the unfair misuse of animal welfare and animal-raising claims.\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Farm Forward, which helped draft the letter, strongly supports these Senators\u2019 efforts to reform labeling practices, and has additionally called for mandatory testing requirements for &#8220;antibiotic free&#8221; claims.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Senators emphasized that 78 percent of consumers pay premium prices for products with higher welfare claims, while 85 percent believe the government should establish and enforce clear definitions for animal welfare labels. However, the current guidelines allow major agricultural corporations to exploit these labels without meaningful verification.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The letter quotes an Indiana turkey farmer\u2019s statement to the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">New York Times <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">of how higher welfare producers like him are disadvantaged by the prevalence of mega-corporations\u2019 misleading labels: \u201cBig Ag has co-opted and bastardized every one of our messages \u2026 When they use a fancy label with absolutely meaningless adjectives, there\u2019s just no way we can compete.\u201d Humanewashing labels undermine independent farmers who invest in implementing the actual animal-raising practices they advertise.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Senators proposed three key recommendations, which Farm Forward endorses:<\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mandatory third-party certifications for animal welfare claims like &#8220;humane&#8221; and &#8220;humanely raised&#8221;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Stronger definitions for terms such as &#8220;free-range,&#8221; &#8220;grassfed,&#8221; and &#8220;pasture-raised&#8221;<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Prohibition of inherently misleading negative claims, such as &#8220;hormone-free&#8221; labels on poultry products where hormone use is already illegal<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In addition, Farm Forward calls for mandatory testing of products labeled as &#8220;antibiotic free.&#8221; Currently, these labels often rely solely on producers\u2019 unverified claims, which at times blatantly mislead consumers about antibiotic use in meat production. <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.regulations.gov\/comment\/FSIS-2024-0010-6438\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Perdue<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, which touts their leadership on antibiotic stewardship, vocally opposes both mandatory on-farm testing by the USDA and sensitive testing at slaughterhouses, raising serious questions about their commitment and transparency.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">&#8220;At a time when our nation is losing independent farms at an alarming rate, we cannot allow mislabeled products to continue tipping the scales in favor of further consolidation,&#8221; the Senators wrote, emphasizing that major agricultural corporations cannot be trusted to self-regulate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">With Farm Forward, these senators find self-evident the importance of protecting the integrity of food labelling, ensuring fair competition in the agricultural sector, and providing consumers with accurate information about their food choices.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">To supplement the Senators\u2019 letter, Farm Forward\u2014along with Consumer Reports, ASPCA, Compassion in World Farming, Food Animal Concerns Trust (FACT), and George Washington School of Public Health Milken Institute\u2019s Antibiotic Resistance Action Center\u2014wrote <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.regulations.gov\/comment\/FSIS-2024-0010-6435\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">a letter<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> to USDA\u2019s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) calling for the following actions, among others:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FSIS should prohibit use of negative antibiotic use claims on products from animals that test positive for antibiotics<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FSIS should require regular testing for all negative antibiotic use claims, not only for new applications but also for companies already approved for these claims and selling in the marketplace<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FSIS should require producers whose product tests positive for antibiotics to demonstrate how they have adequately addressed the root causes of the problem before they are allowed to resume making the claim<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">USDA should conduct and<\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> report publicly<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> on its own testing for antibiotics on all food-animal species for all products labeled with negative antibiotic use claims<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Following a public comment period and participation from all relevant stakeholders, FSIS should codify minimum standards for all animal-raising claims, rather than continuing to employ incredibly vague definitions that allow a huge spectrum of systems to use the same raising claims, failing consumers and producers alike<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FSIS should require (not simply recommend) ongoing third-party verification to substantiate label claims concerning antibiotic, environmental\/carbon, and animal welfare claims<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FSIS should provide financial and technical assistance to small producers to help them access meaningful third-party certification<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FSIS should set clear definitions of environmental-related claims such as \u201cregeneratively raised\u201d, \u201craised using regenerative agriculture practices\u201d, \u201csustainably raised\u201d, \u201ccarbon neutral\u201d, \u201clow-carbon\u201d and \u201cenvironmentally responsible\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FSIS should prohibit the recently approved &#8220;Low-Carbon Beef&#8221; claim as inherently misleading, since conventional beef production emits more greenhouse gasses than any other food product<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Farm Forward will continue to work alongside legislators and other stakeholders to advocate for essential reforms in food labeling practices.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Label integrity for environmental, animal raising, and antibiotics claims will help not only the environment, animal welfare, and public health, but also consumers and independent farmers. Having labels that mean what the public believes they mean will be win-win for everyone\u2014at least, everyone who\u2019s not trying to scam the system. We\u2019ve seen recent progress, with the USDA recommending voluntary verification for some label claims. It\u2019s time for USDA to turn those recommendations into <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/news\/usda-conspiring-with-meat-companies-to-humanewash-with-false-antibiotic-free-labels\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">requirements<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">. <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":15,"featured_media":5202,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":true,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,20,21,24,27,28],"tags":[51,56,58,57,54,52,55,59,53],"class_list":["post-5201","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-animal-product-labeling","category-animal-welfare","category-antibiotics","category-food-policy","category-humanewashing","category-legislation","tag-antibiotics","tag-farmers","tag-greenwashing","tag-humanewashing","tag-labels","tag-policy","tag-regenerative","tag-senate","tag-usda"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/15"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5201"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5201\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5202"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5201"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.farmforward.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}